Skip to main content
Join us for a 2-Part Webinar Discussion

How to Scope a Multifamily Decarbonization Project and Make it Work for the Long Term

Entities across the U.S. are considering multifamily decarbonization projects as part of the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (GGRF) and other decarbonization financing initiatives. However, there are a host of technical issues that need to be resolved to facilitate a scalable financing model for multifamily housing decarbonization projects — in a way that works for an owner, financier, and residents. This 2-part webinar discussion was tailored to green building experts, GGRF applicants, or experienced green building developers to help build a shared understanding of the technical infrastructure needed to support effective deployment of housing decarbonization financing initiatives. The goal is to move toward effective industry-wide protocols and standards that can be rolled out for multifamily housing decarbonization programs.

PART 1:

How do you scope a multifamily decarbonization project and select a technical assistance provider?

February 26, 2024
10:00 – 11:30 am EST

Panel 1: Scoping Out a Multifamily Decarbonization Project

To develop good multifamily decarbonization projects and support decarbonization at scale within conventional financing processes, we need a combination of:

  • longer-term portfolio decarbonization planning that can reduce the assessment time and lead to better outcomes in otherwise tight transactional timelines
  • technology-enabled individual building assessments leveraging digitized and democratized data and decarbonization “comps,” and
  • active and early conversations with the people who live in the building and operate/maintain the building on a daily basis.
Key Takeaways, Best Practices, and Recommendations: 
How do you incorporate decarbonization considerations early in a project and ensure that sustainability measures make it through the design and construction process?

For existing properties, portfolio-level analysis can be a powerful tool. This would include mapping out the current state of buildings within the portfolio, identifying current energy consumption, flagging buildings that are large energy users, flagging buildings that have older equipment that needs to be replaced, aligning with recapitalization events, and setting clear decarbonization goals for the portfolio. Stewards for Affordable Housing (SAHF) and RMI have developed building decarbonization portfolio planning tools.

Portfolio planning can provide an opportunity to take a longer-term perspective, mapping out what can be done now to reduce emissions and what can be done in alignment with planned equipment replacement and facility upgrades over a 10–15-year period. Decarbonization assessments across multiple buildings in a portfolio will provide better outcomes.

To ensure that sustainability recommendations do not get value engineered out of a construction project, owners need to be intentional in every stage of development/ construction. At a minimum, an expert and champion must be engaged not just in the decarbonization scoping/assessment, but in reviewing equipment specifications, bids, and providing some construction oversight on site.

Start with simple building benchmarking at the project inception stage [see below].

The green building consultant should be engaged early on to develop a scope which will be reflected in the loan agreement.

The process for scoping out a multifamily decarbonization project is very different for acquisition of buildings vs an existing portfolio. For new acquisitions, we need to move fast and with imperfect information. We need a good set of assessment questions to use prior to getting on site. These assessment questions can be informed by guidance documents from the Better Buildings program and Enterprise Green Communities.

What protocols, modeling & analysis tools, and approaches can be used to make the predevelopment process faster, cheaper, and more effective? What decarbonization scoping tools and resources do we need to build that do not exist today?

Decarbonization recommendations are better and more durable when the green building consultant is engaged in a conversation with the owner, operations staff, and residents to understand:

  • goals and challenges of the owner,
  • goals and challenges of the residents,
  • needs and insights of the people who are closest to the buildings energy systems, i.e., operations & maintenance staff.

We need to democratize data and get existing building data into a simple digital platform that can be used to inform and expedite decarbonization assessments. This is important for Affordable Housing owners who typically lack resources and often are in reactive modes. There is a tremendous amount of publicly available information on existing buildings to inform decarbonization assessments, but it is not readily accessible.

To facilitate rapid decarbonization assessments for new acquisitions, we need regionally specific “as is” comps and “decarbonized” comps, with prototypical decarbonization upgrades readily available for a specific typology that can be adjusted/refined.

To improve our ability to cost estimate, we need to leverage technology to systematically collect retrofit and new construction cost data for the early projects that will be supported under large-scale program like the GGRF. Experts can then use their time providing more value by engaging owners and assessing the needs of occupants throughout the process.

Climate Friendly Homes is endeavoring to do this with the 10,000 units that it is electrifying.

GGRF and HUD Green and Resilient Retrofit Program (GGRP) provide unique opportunities to collect large amounts of decarbonization construction cost data; this can be built into the verification process, if pre-defined costs categories are established in advance.

Future Housing Initiative is creating a database of performance data for multifamily buildings that can be leveraged to collect construction cost data.

Additional Resources

Panelists

Panel 2: Finding the Right Technical Assistance Provider

Decarbonization of multifamily buildings is not general practice in the construction industry, hence typically requires outside/third-party green buildings experts to help identify viable decarbonization options, scope out a project, estimate costs, and oversee construction. As we evolve from traditional limited-scope energy efficiency projects toward multiphase decarbonization construction projects, often entailing major HVAC system upgrades, building owners will need longer-term technical assistance partners who can marry engineering insights with asset management to find efficiencies and lower costs.

Key Takeaways, Best Practices, and Recommendations: 
How can building owners find technical assistance providers who can assess options, scope projects, and assist with design through construction? What professional qualifications/certifications are needed?

Several multifamily sustainability programs across the U.S. have pre-approved technical assistance providers, including Enterprise Green Communities, NYSERDA, and Fannie Mae. These lists are a good place to start, but there will be some trial and error to learn who you can partner effectively with throughout complicated issues and processes.

Shifting from efficiency to decarbonization is a game changer: now a building owner needs a long-term roadmap that is likely to span multiple phases of construction potentially over several years; need a long-term technical assistance partner that can scope a project and be involved through design and construction; it’s a relationship not an event-based “audit”; softer communication skills are critical.

Asset management and decarbonization planning have to become one thing: Scoping the path to net zero and capital planning needs to be integrated, and good technical assistance providers need to understand and be conversant in both.

Most firms with electrification expertise are not local, and will command a premium. This could be a challenge in these early days of multifamily building decarbonization.

As green buildings have evolved from an energy efficiency focus to decarbonization and electrification, the knowledge requirements for technical assistance providers have changed. “It used to be BPI certification was adequate for a good technical assistance provider, now it’s so much more.” It is less clear today which minimum certifications are appropriate for the complex multiphase world of multifamily building decarbonization.

Building decarbonization is about transforming the entire industry of construction, housing and lending to infuse decarbonization considerations throughout. Many people have a decisional role in the efficiency and operation of building – establishing a common vocabulary is important. This is what BEEX and the Building Performance Partnerships are trying to do in target localities across the US.

How do you contain costs associated with necessary third-party technical assistance?

Owners want to maximize the funding that goes into the durable physical upgrades in the building; this requires effective management of third-party consulting costs.

Creativity is in tension with scale and speed: You can start with a blank canvas and come up with creative ideas to decarbonize a building but it’s time-consuming. Eventually we will start to have enough data to see the patterns of which decarbonization solutions work well in what applications, and we should then be able to reduce investment in outside third-party bespoke consulting services in every stage of construction or shift those services to more value-added functions.

If you work at scale you can drive down the associated consulting costs, as Fannie Mae has done with their high performance building specialists under Green Rewards. Additionally if you have a standardized decarb scope of work for a narrow subset of building types, as is the case with CPC’s Climate Friendly Homes (i.e., replace fossil HVAC systems with high efficiency heat pumps), you can standardize the scope of Technical Assistance and drive economies of scale to reduce third-party consulting costs.

Need a good screening process/tool; you don’t want to waste money doing a full blown decarbonization assessment on a building that is likely going to be a poor candidate for a major retrofit.

Technology Platforms (like Cadence OneFive‘s Momentum) can be used to reduce consulting level-of-effort by streamlining the process of project management (i.e. capturing audit recommendations, bids, milestones) and sharing with partners.

Additional Resources

Sample of Multifamily Sustainability Programs with Pre-Approved Technical Assistance Providers:

Panelists

PART 2:

How do you ensure your project is working for the long term? (Commissioning and Asset Management)

March 4, 2024
1:00 – 2:30 pm EST

Commissioning is critical to the success of complex decarbonization projects, in everything from early-stage design reviews through functional/operational checks on mechanical equipment.

Be mindful of the people who live and work in the building day in and out: frontline property management and maintenance staff and residents. Ensure that people have voice and agency where they live and work, including them as projects move forwards. Ensure your operations staff are trained and pay attention to ongoing operational performance data.

While a good design is foundational to project success it is only one small part of ensuring that a multifamily decarbonization project delivers a better place to live and work – and that needs to be our goal.

Key Takeaways, Best Practices, and Recommendations: 
What are best practice verification and commissioning protocols for a multifamily decarbonization construction project to maximize its ability to achieve its performance goals?

Need to put systems in place to support continuous oversight of the performance of real estate. Applications like shadow meters, routine benchmarking, and real-time energy management systems with early fault detection can provide tremendous value.

To support market transformation, as we move from early adopters to mass adopters, we need a cohort of properties doing continuous whole-building monitoring, but we also need a subset that is doing equipment-level monitoring – not for compliance, but so that we can continue to refine our tools and our capacity to support effective projects.

Implementing upstream commissioning/checks on the design before it gets built will be important for complex decarb projects, even if it is just to ensure that equipment will fit the allocated space and maintenance workers can physically access the equipment.

For major decarb retrofits which will likely include replacement of HVAC/mechanical systems, commissioning is critical to position the project and people for success by ensuring that:

  • equipment is installed properly and operational
  • control sequence of operation of the HVAC system makes sense
  • building management systems have been tested
  • documentation for equipment and warranties are provided to owners and owner knows how to act on a warranty issues
  • operational staff have been trained on the equipment and the training is recorded to help onboard any new maintenance staff

Preservation of Affordable Housing (POAH) and ASHRAE have some good resources on commissioning.

Fannie Mae’s Green Rewards program has an established post-construction verification process that they use before releasing loan payments. This verification process is not a full commissioning requirement and typically entails a visual inspection to make sure the equipment specified in the loan documents has been installed. GGRF projects are likely to be more complicated than historical Green Rewards projects, so some upgrading of the verification process may be needed.

How can a building owner ensure that its operations & maintenance staff are equipped and trained to handle the new low-carbon solutions?
  • Have your operator at the table when starting a project. They know the building, the tenants, and day-to-day operations which will be critical to project success. If you are working with a consultant, build into your contract requirements to include documentation and in-person orientation/walkthrough with operational staff. This operator engagement helps with tenant satisfaction, as tenants will go first to the super; if you want the operational staff/building super/property manager to be able to answer resident questions to generate more support for the project, make sure they understand why you are doing the project and what it will mean for them.
  • Send your operators to training and attend the training with them. See if you can do group training on site if you have multiple buildings to facilitate discussion and comradery. Communicate what you want to achieve after the training (e.g., develop a plan, increase familiarity with new technology, review proposals, develop solutions to possible challenges). If you have unionized labor, reach out to union for training. If not there are other organizations that can provide training. [see below]
  • Ensure that any new hires get training on the building systems and that they understand what the owner and the residents value in terms of these systems.
  • Ensure that operational staff know who to call if there is a problem. Operational staff are great problem solvers but they may not land on the most energy-optimized solution and for that they will need support.
  • Equipment manufacturers will often provide training – take advantage of this.
  • Role of the building operators has changed significantly with new technology and building management systems. Make sure your operators understand the performance goals and metrics that the owner cares about.
  • This operator training and engagement supports job retention and can be a source of pride for front-line workers who care about the buildings they serve.
  • “If you are doing a project and it is going to make things harder for operations staff, it’s probably not the right project.”
What annual performance data is most useful to assess building performance? What do we need to pay attention to?
  • Basic whole-building benchmarking, e.g., Energy Star Portfolio Manager, is useful for assessing carbon emissions and is expected to be required in some form for the GGRF. This is typically required under most public benchmarking disclosure regulations.
  • But to understand the impact of a decarb project on tenant bills, you are going to need to go one step further, separating owner-paid and resident-paid utilities. This is particularly important in the context of electrification. This may require some sampling and will likely require additional support for building owners to ensure good data quality.
  • Owners should measure resident satisfaction before a project, through the process, and afterwards and learn from feedback.
  • As the program manager or financial intermediary, make sure you know what you are going to do with the data – how feasible it is to collect? what question you are trying to address with the data? – before you establish a collection requirement.
  • Optimizing for scale means designing to optimize an entire portfolio, not achieving perfection for one building. Expect that some things will go wrong, learn quickly and adjust. Given the magnitude of the transformation we are seeking in the built environment, we need to share failures as well as successes, that’s how real learning and training happens.
Additional Resources

Panelists

<  Back to the Technical Assistance Webinar Series